INFORMATION
Plagiarism-Policy
PLAGIARISM POLICY
Scope
Submissions must distinguish the authors’ contributions from existing work. Unattributed use of another person’s wording, ideas, results, images, code or translated material is unacceptable. Authors must also disclose substantial overlap with their own publications and related submissions. Repackaging the same findings without an adequate new contribution or proper disclosure is unacceptable.
Screening and interpretation
This journal may evaluate submitted manuscripts using similarity detection services available to the editorial team, in addition to the editorial review process. Manuscripts submitted by authors in accordance with the established plagiarism policy which permits a 20 per cent similarity rate may be accepted for submission and review. If the similarity rate exceeds the specified limit, the manuscript will be returned to the author and subsequently analysed by the editor before a decision is made. The similarity score is merely a screening indicator, not proof of plagiarism. No numerical score guarantees originality or automatically indicates an ethical breach. The editors will examine the location, nature and source of overlapping sections, including legitimate quotations, references and necessary technical terminology. This policy does not require the use of any specific software subscription.
Related research outputs
Disclose related preprints, theses, conference papers, datasets and published articles in the cover letter, with links and an explanation of overlap and new contribution. A preprint or thesis is not automatically disqualifying. An expanded conference paper requires transparent citation, permission where needed and a substantive contribution; translation alone is insufficient. Simultaneous journal submission of the same manuscript is prohibited.
Response and outcomes
Editors document the concern and seek an author response when appropriate. Limited attribution problems may require revision; extensive appropriation or undisclosed duplication may justify rejection and an institutional referral. After publication, concerns are addressed through a correction, expression of concern or retraction according to their effect on the record. Decisions rely on evidence and proportionate assessment, not on software output alone. Reports should include the article DOI, source material and specific overlapping passages and may be sent to info@das-institute.com.
References
